What are some effective risk response strategies and techniques? (2024)

There are four main risk response strategies to deal with identified risks: avoiding, transferring, mitigating, and accepting. Each strategy has its own pros and cons depending on the nature, probability, and impact of the risk. Avoiding involves eliminating the risk or its causes, or changing the plan to avoid the risk exposure. This is an effective strategy for high-impact and high-probability risks, but it may require significant changes in scope, schedule, cost, or quality. Transferring involves shifting the risk or its consequences to a third party, such as a contractor, insurer, or partner. This is a good strategy for low-impact and high-probability risks, but it may involve additional costs, contracts, or dependencies. Mitigating involves reducing the probability or impact of the risk by implementing preventive or corrective actions. This is suitable for moderate-impact and moderate-probability risks, but it may consume resources, time, or budget. Accepting means acknowledging the risk and its potential effects and being prepared to deal with them if they occur. This is a reasonable strategy for low-impact and low-probability risks; however, it may require contingency plans, reserves, or monitoring.

There are several risk response techniques that you can use to implement the chosen risk response strategy, such as escalation, contingency, reserve, avoidance, transfer, mitigation, and acceptance. Escalation involves raising the risk to a higher level of authority or responsibility. Contingency involves creating a plan B or an alternative course of action in case the risk materializes. Reserve involves setting aside a portion of the budget or schedule to cover the potential costs or delays of the risk. Avoidance involves changing the scope, schedule, cost, or quality of the project to eliminate the risk or its causes. Transfer involves transferring the risk or its consequences to a third party through contracts, insurance, partnerships, or other mechanisms. Mitigation involves taking actions to reduce the probability or impact of the risk. Lastly, acceptance involves accepting the risk and its potential effects and monitoring it for any changes or triggers.

Risk response planning is the process of developing and documenting the appropriate strategies and techniques for each identified risk. This iterative and collaborative process involves prioritizing risks based on their probability and impact, selecting the best risk response strategy, defining specific risk response techniques, assigning roles and responsibilities for each action, and updating the risk management plan with the risk response information. The cost-benefit analysis, stakeholder preferences, and project constraints should all be taken into consideration when selecting a risk response strategy. Additionally, the feasibility, effectiveness, and efficiency of each technique should be considered when defining the risk response techniques.

Risk response execution is the process of implementing the risk response actions according to the risk response plan. This proactive, continuous process includes communicating the plan to relevant stakeholders, executing the planned actions with appropriate tools and resources, monitoring and controlling risk response actions with indicators such as KPIs, variance analysis, or audits, evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of the risk response actions with measures such as actual vs planned results, cost-benefit analysis, or lessons learned, and updating the risk register and risk management plan with status, issues, changes, and actions.

Risk response review is a periodic and retrospective process that involves collecting feedback and data from stakeholders, sources, and tools involved in the risk response process. This feedback and data should then be analyzed to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the risk response process and performance. Recommendations and actions should be generated to enhance the risk response process and performance based on criteria such as best practices or standards. These recommendations should then be implemented to improve the risk response process and performance, followed by monitoring and measuring the results and benefits of the recommendations with tools such as dashboards or metrics.

Risk Management

+ Follow

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.